Every manuscript submitted to this journal will undergo an initial screening process by the editor to ensure that the article is in accordance with the journal’s focus and scope, the completeness of its writing structure, and compliance with the established author guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s basic requirements may be returned to the author before entering the review stage.
Manuscripts that are deemed administratively and substantively eligible will proceed to the peer review process by reviewers who have expertise relevant to the article’s field of study. The review process is conducted objectively, independently, and professionally by considering originality, scientific contribution, methodological accuracy, strength of analysis, and the relevance of the references used.
The final decision on the manuscript is determined based on the reviewers’ evaluation results and the editor’s consideration. The decision may include acceptance, acceptance with revision, return for improvement, or rejection. The entire review process is carried out to maintain the academic quality, scientific integrity, and publication standards of the journal.
| JOURNAL TEAM |
|---|
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS |
|---|
| Author Guidelines |
| Article Template |
| Publication Ethics |
| Author Fees |
| Screening for Plagiarism |
| Statement Policy Review |
| EDITORIAL POLICIES |
|---|
| Open Access Statement |
| Copyright Notice |
| GenAI Policies |
| Archiving Policy |
| Indexing |
| TOOLS |
| Turnitin |
| Grammarly |
| Mendeley |
